A few months ago I posted a positive review of a little horror movie called "Reeker". It told of an unknown entity which stalked a stranded group of friends in the middle of the desert. It was creative and surprising... tonight I watched it's sequel, or rather prequel. "No Man's Land" is a steaming pile of shit. The first 15 minutes take place in 1978 and we get a back-story of how the Reeker came to be. There's some cool and genuinely gruesome stuff in this brief intro, but then the movie jumps to "present day", which is actually set just before the first film. It's basically a half-arsed rehash of the first movie. There is nothing inspiring about it and it's acted atrociously. The movie was written and directed by the same guy but I have no idea what he was thinking? Even in script form there is no way he could have possibly thought this was improving on the original. I don't understand the logic behind this movie when there was potential to turn the story into a nice little franchise. Enough said, No Man's Land sucks.